By Drew Dietsch
| Printed
Some of the memorable moments in Quentin Tarantinoโs Kill Bill is when the villainous Bill paralyzes the heroic Bride a.okay.a Beatrix Kiddo and waxes philosophic on his views in regards to the character of Superman.
Itโs a stellar little bit of writing delivered expertly by David Carradine in whatโs arguably his biggest display screen position.
Sadly, it’s so beloved that lots of people take it at face worth. They purchase into Billโs tackle Superman as a reputable one. That tells me they arenโt seeing the forest for the timber throughout this important second, both as an precise analysis of Superman or the precise purpose for the scene.
Bill Canโt See The Actual Clark Kent Or Superman

The key flaw in Billโs learn on Clark Kent and Superman is available in his basic misunderstanding of the personas of Clark Kent and Superman. He canโt see Clark Kent as something greater than an outright efficiency โโ an opinion formed extra by the Christoper Reeve movies than comedian books โโ whereas Superman is the true identification as a result of it being the persona he was born into.
Anybody with a fuller understanding of the characterโs historical past and tales is aware of how reversed this task of roles really is. Although Clark has this unbelievable heritage that informs his character, he was raised as Clark Kent and lives a life as Clark Kent. Itโs solely later that he adopts the Superman persona and crafts it to be a form of efficiency that integrates his truest self.
Ultimately, he finds a wholesome life balancing the 2 sides of his alien lineage and his homegrown American upbringing. It doesnโt really mirror Billโs view on the character in any respect. It looks as if a basic misunderstanding of the character.
Which is why itโs so vital to keep in mind that Bill is the villain of the story.
A Villain Warps A Hero To Management One other Hero

The Kill Bill Superman monologue takes place inside an important energy dynamic within the story. Beatrix Kiddo is pumped with an excellent reality serum Bill calls โthe undisputed reality.โ Bill is utilizing this situation and his Superman analogy to argue that Beatrix was mendacity to herself about making an attempt to stay a easy life.
Beatrix does admit this harsh emotional reality about her tried escape into anonymity, however she additionally fires again that she wouldโve had her daughter. She wouldโve discovered a method to happiness. However the alternative to chase that was eradicated by Bill due to his want to manage Beatrix.
And thatโs what this scene and monologue are actually about: controlling the narrative Beatrix tells herself. Bill weaponizes his warped view on Clark Kent and Superman to weaken Beatrixโs resolve. Even when he actually believes in his tackle Superman, heโs not espousing it to be a mouthpiece for the author or to current some grand inventive argument. Heโs a personality all about manipulation and his twisted thought of Clark Kent and Superman is simply extra manipulation, each of the reality in regards to the character and Beatrixโs truths about herself.
Look, let me boil it all the way down to a extra relatable framework for this dialogue: do you really imagine something Lex Luthor says when he describes his appraisal of Supermanโs character? In case you wouldnโt hearken to that villainโs opinion, why would you hearken to Bill? They each use their viewpoints on Superman to truly push their very own depraved agendas.
I like Kill Bill, I like Superman, and I like this scene. Nevertheless, itโs time to cease studying it as a worthwhile critique on the Man of Metal. As a substitute, see it for what it truly is: a nasty man who performs at figuring out what a great man is so he can hold being a nasty man.